SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals
7 references·3 citing·44 second hop
No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals (2016)No improvement in the reporting of clinic…Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications (2014)Subgroup analyses in randomis…Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review (2012)Credibility of claims of subg…Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge? (2009)Dealing with heterogeneity of…Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views (2007)Life and times of the impact …Moderators of Treatment Outcomes (2006)Moderators of Treatment Outco…Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…Treatment effect modification due to comorbidity: Individual participant data meta-analyses of 120 randomised controlled trials (2023)Treatment effect modification…Multi-disciplinary fairness considerations in machine learning for clinical trials (2022)Multi-disciplinary fairness c…Justification and reporting of subgroup analyses were lacking or inadequate in randomized controlled trials (2018)Justification and reporting o…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Cognitive–behavioral guided self-help for eating disorders: Effectiveness and scalability (2012)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research (2018)Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey (2018)Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees (2001)How Do Risk Factors Work Together? Mediators, Moderators, and Independent, Overlapping, and Proxy Risk Factors (2001)Emotional benefits of mindfulness-based stress reduction in older adults: the moderating roles of age and depressive symptom severity (2013)Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate (2013)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores (2010)Bibliometric Indicators for Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Publications (2014)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (2010)Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration (2015)Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease (2015)The lack of statistical power of subgroup analyses in meta-analyses: a cautionary note (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)How to Use a Subgroup Analysis (2014)Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials (2019)Effects of mindfulness interventions on depressive symptoms in adolescents: A meta-analysis (2020)A theory of justice original editionDissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals (2007)Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses (2020)Core GRADE 5: rating certainty of evidence—assessing indirectness (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 2012Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review395 cited
  • 2006Moderators of Treatment Outcomes310 cited
  • 2007Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views164 cited
  • 2009Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge?111 cited
  • 2014Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications102 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Justification and reporting of subgroup analyses were lacking or inadequate in randomized controlled trials31 cited
  • 2022Multi-disciplinary fairness considerations in machine learning for clinical trials30 cited
  • 2023Treatment effect modification due to comorbidity: Individual participant data meta-analyses of 120 randomised controlled trials22 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work