SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Error is an Error… is an Erratum: The Ethics of not Correcting Errors in the Science Literature
7 references·16 citing·44 second hop
An Error is an Error… is an Erratum: The Ethics of not Correcting Errors in the Science Literature (2016)An Error is an Error… is an Erratum: The …Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone (2016)Who's downloading pirated pap…Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone (2016)Who's downloading pirated pap…Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context (2016)Notices and Policies for Retr…Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Editors (2014)Responsible Research Publicat…Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Problems with Traditional Sci…PROMOTING RESEARCH INTEGRITY IN A GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT (2011)PROMOTING RESEARCH INTEGRITY …The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)The Responsible Conduct of Re…The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature (2025)The Citation of Retracted Pap…Nature and characteristics of global attention to research on article processing charges (2023)Nature and characteristics of…From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper (2023)From citation metrics to cita…“Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature (2023)“Tortured Phrases” in Covid-1…The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data (2021)The use of confidentiality an…Outsourced English revision, editing, publication consultation, and integrity services should be acknowledged in an academic paper (2021)Outsourced English revision, …Eszett (ẞ; ß)-carotene is an erroneous, non-existent false positive of beta (β)-carotene (2021)Eszett (ẞ; ß)-carotene is an …Confusing German Eszett (ẞ; ß) with Greek beta (β) in Biomedical Writing (2021)Confusing German Eszett (ẞ; ß…An extended state of uncertainty: A snap-shot of expressions of concern in neuroscience (2021)An extended state of uncertai…Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations (2020)Silently withdrawn or retract…Evolution in the Correction of the Literature: Preprints, Manuscript Versioning, Error Amendment, and Retract and Replace (2020)Evolution in the Correction o…Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction (2019)Toward fulfilling the aspirat…Published errors and errata in library and information science journals (2019)Published errors and errata i…Is the soundness-only quality control policy of open access mega journals linked to a higher rate of published errors? (2019)Is the soundness-only quality…Legends in Science: from Boom to Bust (2016)Legends in Science: from Boom…Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior (2016)Fortifying the Corrective Nat…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Peer review and the publication process (2016)Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)Is Peer Review a Good Idea? (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals (2012)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)A survey of retracted articles in dentistry (2017)Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016) (2017)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)The Impact Factor Game (2006)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Challenges to open peer review (2018)Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud? (2021)Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021 (2022)COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives (2020)The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers be assigned equal status? (2022)Institutional logics in the open science practices of university–industry research collaboration (2023)The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)Internal Confidentiality: When Confidentiality Assurances Fail Relational Informants (2004)Protecting Respondent Confidentiality in Qualitative Research (2009)Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice (2014)What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions? (2023)Ethical Issues in Educational Research (2024)No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports (2024)Improving transparency and reproducibility through registration: The status of intervention trials published in clinical psychology journals. (2016)Evaluation of spin in abstracts of papers in psychiatry and psychology journals (2019)Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review (2022)Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurial Future (2011)The machine question: critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics (2013)30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2018)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Highly cited retracted papers (2017)Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2017)Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology (2021)Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports (2014)Homo Citans and Carbon Allotropes: For an Ethics of Citation (2016)Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The Responsible Conduct of Research393 cited
  • 2016Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone214 cited
  • 2014Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review158 cited
  • 2011PROMOTING RESEARCH INTEGRITY IN A GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT152 cited
  • 2014Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Editors79 cited
  • 2016Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone75 cited
  • 2016Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context69 cited

Cited by

  • 2021The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data41 cited
  • 2016Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior39 cited
  • 2020Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations28 cited
  • 2019Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction24 cited
  • 2021Outsourced English revision, editing, publication consultation, and integrity services should be acknowledged in an academic paper19 cited
  • 2019Is the soundness-only quality control policy of open access mega journals linked to a higher rate of published errors?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited
  • 2021An extended state of uncertainty: A snap-shot of expressions of concern in neuroscience14 cited
  • 2025The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature14 cited
  • 2023“Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature12 cited
  • 2016Legends in Science: from Boom to Bust11 cited
  • 2019Published errors and errata in library and information science journals11 cited
  • 2023Nature and characteristics of global attention to research on article processing charges9 cited
  • 2021Confusing German Eszett (ẞ; ß) with Greek beta (β) in Biomedical Writing8 cited
  • 2020Evolution in the Correction of the Literature: Preprints, Manuscript Versioning, Error Amendment, and Retract and Replace6 cited
  • 2023From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper6 cited
  • 2021Eszett (ẞ; ß)-carotene is an erroneous, non-existent false positive of beta (β)-carotene6 cited