No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The category ‘race’ was widely used not only to ascribe social inferiority to entire sections of the global population (particularly overseas colonial societies in the nineteenth century) but also to ethnic minorities in nation-building Europe and ‘internal colonies’ on the Celtic fringe of Victorian Britain. 1 As such, however, it was a category that was quite distinct from ‘ethnicity’, which signified a sense of belongingness and fostered quasi-biological constructs of peoples as self-conscious ‘imagined communities’ and nations in the metropolitan world. 2 Both these categories shared a common geography and a common history. They originated in Western Europe, particularly in Britain and France, and entered European academic and political discourse in the Darwinian half of the nineteenth century. There are, nevertheless, important distinctions between them which merit more detailed treatment, which they shall receive here. These distinctions are worth bearing in mind in any discussion on the position of Irish emigrants in their host societies since the nineteenth century. For present purposes, however, it is important to contrast the ‘exclusiveness’ of ‘race’ and the ‘inclusiveness’ of ‘ethnicity’. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.