Theorizing Refusal: An Introduction

Abstract

To refuse is to say no.But, no, it is not just that.To refuse can be generative and strategic, a deliberate move toward one thing, belief, practice, or community and away from another.Refusals illuminate limits and possibilities, especially but not only of the state and other institutions.And yet, refusal cannot be cast merely as a response to authority, or an updated version of resistance, or a concept to subsume under already existing scholarly categories.Instead, the contributors to this Openings collection find refusal to be about the social as much as the political, to be a concept in dialogue with exchange and equality.In The Gift, Marcel Mauss (1967) discusses refusal as the cutting of social relations, or in some instances as the raising anew of obligations and rituals.We seek to theorize refusal in this collection as concept to both think with and think about.We approach refusal as ethnographic subject and mode, recognizing each as making its own set of moral claims, including claims about how we receive, make sense of, and present (or not) ethnographic worlds.Yet why the concept of refusal now?Why not just use the term resistance (see Theodossopoulos 2014)?A quarter of a century ago, Lila Abu-Lughod (1990,