The Salience of Species Difference for Feminist Theory

Abstract

This Article assumes an intersectional and feminist perspective to argue that being human should not be the qualification for justice or legal personhood. Drawing from feminist analyses of animal theory, and various strands of critical theory, this Article argues that feminists and other advocates of human rights, for whom interrogating constructs of gender, race, culture, sexuality, etc., are important, must also attend to species difference and the treatment of nonhuman animals to be consistent and effective in their discursive critiques and legal interventions. It does so by examining species difference as a social construction and the similarities and interconnections in the "logic" supporting intra-human hierarchies with the discourses commonly adduced to exclude nonhuman animals from ethical and legal consideration.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.