SStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleBeat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric

Ewen Callaway2016

OA

Articlebronze2016

Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric

220 citations·0/0 files stored·Nature

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 220 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2017Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study 2020How the Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards Affects What Is Published in JCR-Ranked Communication Journals 2017CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?2019How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia 2018The Impact Factor Fallacy 2017Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015 2019Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging journals 2019The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing

Details

Year2016

Typearticle

Published2016-07-08

VenueNature

ISSN-L0028-0836

Languageen

Citations220

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1038/nature.2016.20224

openalex_workW2473748898

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.