Remembrance and Revenge: Hamlet, Macbeth and The Tempest

Abstract

In this paper I shall be looking at three plays — Hamlet , Macbeth and The Tempest — as versions of revenge tragedy, I am not proposing any contentious reclassification. Shakespeare’s contemporaries did not envisage a distinct species of drama called ‘revenge tragedy’: and the ‘genre’ is really only a modern abstraction from a recurrent set of conventions, all of which make their individual appearance in plays we should not normally think of labelling ‘revenge tragedies’ at all. In choosing to emphasise those aspects of my three plays which link them to a ‘revenge tradition’, I want only to place them in a fresh perspective:[1] in so doing I hope also to suggest some new ways of thinking about this tradition — about the importance it had for Renaissance Englishmen and for Shakespeare in particular. Prospero’s renunciation of ‘vengeance’ in the name of ‘virtue’ marks the conclusion not just of his own moral pilgrimage, but of his creator’s long meditation on man’s relation with his past, on the significance of remembrance and revenge. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.