Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Improving the Peer review process: Capturing more information and enabling high-risk/high-return research

7 references·7 citing·57 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1973The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities29,064 cited
1932A technique for measurement of attitudes9,567 cited
2012Bias in peer review997 cited
2014Bias in research294 cited
2003A Multilevel Cross-Classified Modelling Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Effects of Assessor and Researcher Attributes on Assessor Ratings139 cited
2011Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts133 cited
2006Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications44 cited

Cited by

2022Do Funding Agencies Select and Enable Risky Research: Evidence from ERC Using Novelty as a Proxy of Risk Taking27 cited
2021Uncertainty and Risk-Taking in Science: Meaning, Measurement and Management in Peer Review of Research Proposals20 cited
2021The modified lottery: Formalizing the intrinsic randomness of research funding15 cited
2021Funding Risky Research15 cited
2017Uncertainty and Individual Discretion in Allocating Research Funds12 cited
2021Developing doctoral students' / researchers’ understanding of the journal peer-review process10 cited
2025Do funding agencies select and enable novel research: evidence from ERC9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work