Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity (February 1975)

Abstract

Introduction This chapter began as an attempt to formalise a simple general equilibrium version of the Chamberlinian monopolistic competition model, in order to see whether there is any validity in the common assertion that monopolistic competition leads to too much product diversification. Chamberlin (1950, p. 89) himself was careful not to make any such assertion; as a matter of fact, he saw the central issue very clearly, and expressed it succinctly as follows: ‘It is true that the same total resources … may be made to yield more units of product by being concentrated on fewer firms. The issue might be put as efficiency versus diversity’. Kaldor (1933, p. 50), too, saw that excess capacity was not the same as excessive diversity. He said that if economies of scale were exploited to a greater extent, ‘the public would be offered finally larger amounts of number of commodities; and it is impossible to tell how far people prefer quantity to diversity and vice versa’. What this really means is that a model must be specified in greater detail to determine conditions under which the one or the other might be expected. The one example which has been worked out in detail, the Hotelling spatial location model, has led many economists to the presumption that there is in fact excessive diversity associated with monopolistic competition. The results of our analysis throw considerable doubt on this presumption.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 312 citations exist upstream.