SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

NSF tries two-step review, drawing praise—and darts · Study

WorkNSF tries two-step review, drawing praise—and darts

Jeffrey D. Mervis2016

Work2016

NSF tries two-step review, drawing praise—and darts

Jeffrey D. Mervis

6 citations·0/0 files stored·Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Research, Science, and Academia Academic Publishing and Open Access Science and Science Education

Abstract

Brief preliminary proposals can't do justice to innovative research, scientists complain.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2020Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process

Details

Year2016

Typeother

Published2016-08-04

VenueScience

ISSN-L0036-8075

Languageen

Citations6

Files0 public / 0

ShelfResearch, Science, and Academia

Identifiers

doi10.1126/science.353.6299.528

openalex_workW2476839975

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.