By parallel reasoning : the construction and evaluation of analogical arguments

Paul F. A. Bartha

148 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and History of Science Philosophy, Science, and History

Abstract

In this work, Paul Bartha proposes a normative theory of analogical arguments and raises questions and proposes answers regarding the criteria for evaluating analogical arguments, the philosophical justification for analogical reasoning, and the place of scientific analogies in the context of theoretical confirmation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 148 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2012Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics 2012Introduction to “New Conceptualizations of Transfer of Learning”2017Epistemology of causal inference in pharmacology 2019What we cannot learn from analogue experiments 2019Brain-Mind 2016Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions 2018‘Of Water Drops and Atomic Nuclei: Analogies and Pursuit Worthiness in Science’2018String theory, non-empirical theory assessment, and the context of pursuit

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.