Identification of Imported Ceramics Through Functional Analysis of Attributes

Stephanie M. Whittlesey

12 citations0/0 files storedKIVA

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction

Abstract

The use of technical ceramic analysis is not always feasible for the archaeologist seeking information concerning the locale of ceramic production. An alternative method for differentiating imported from locally produced ceramics, utilizing stylistic and functional attributes, is suggested. This method is operationalized in a functional analysis of three ceramic types from the Grasshopper Pueblo. The results of this analysis provide some cautionary implications for the archaeologist interpreting behavioral interactions by means of ceramic data.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

References

1972Archaeological Context and Systemic Context 1925Handbook of the Indians of California 1969New Perspectives in Archeology.1964Archeology as Anthropology: A Case Study 1971The Origin and Development of Lowland Classic Maya Civilization 1956A Petrographic Study of Gila Polychrome

Cited by

2005LATE ANCESTRAL PUEBLO OR MOGOLLON PUEBLO? AN ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVE ON IDENTITY

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.