CAN JUST WAR THEORY JUSTIFY TARGETED KILLING? THREE POSSIBLE MODELS

Daniel Statman

37 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

War, Ethics, and Justification Philosophical Ethics and Theory Violence, Religion, and Philosophy

Abstract

Abstract This chapter focuses on the morality of targeted killing (TK). Section II, against most common wisdom in the field, suggests that the notion of TK should be released from its association with the war (or wars) against terror. Section III presents three interpretations of just war theory that will serve as the basis for the moral analysis of TK. Section IV turns to this analysis and shows how each of the three interpretations supports the practice of TK.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2021Just and Unjust Uses of Limited Force 2020Debating Targeted Killing 2020Asymmetric Killing 2018Justified killing in an age of radically asymmetric warfare

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.