Against Materialism in Literary Theory

Abstract

‘Materialism’ has been a shibboleth in cultural analysis for three hundred years. If we discard the word itself and concentrate instead on its various, shifting significances, it has been a major bone of contention in philosophy and aesthetics for three thousand. In fact, materialism predates theoretical thought altogether, and there seems a distinct possibility that it will also postdate such thought. Because of its invariably pivotal position in humanistic discourse, a survey of materialism’s historical vicissitudes illuminates the progress taken by abstract thought in general. It also suggests some explanations for materialism’s increasing prominence today in the field of literary theory. For although that field is as riven by contention as it has ever been, it is close to unanimous in one regard. The vast majority of today’s literary theorists, like the overwhelming majority of Western intellectuals as a whole, share a methodological commitment to materialism. In fact, this commitment is often so deep as to be unconscious. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.