No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
To Aris Spanos χάρις χάριν γάρ ἐστιν ἡ τίκτουσ' ἀeί. The negative image of Byzantium drawn by historians of the Enlightenment and Romanticism is well known. In an attempt to correct this image Byzantinists have repeatedly pointed to the continuous cultivation of ancient learning during the Christian Greek Middle Ages. Yet the Byzantines themselves were partly responsible for both negative and positive images, which are to a substantial degree misrepresentations, in that, within their highly conservative society, they very often presented their thoughts in a manner seemingly unaltered since Hellenistic antiquity. Pedagogy is just such a case: viewed superficially, nothing changed from late antique grammarians to the end of the Byzantine Empire in the mid-fifteenth century. However, during specific periods of Byzantine history a series of ideological clashes lead to important changes in education and in the perception of pedagogy. These clashes were primarily and most importantly conducted between philosophy and theology in order to define the meaning and function of ancient learning within a Christian society. The present paper will focus on one period in Byzantium's millenium-long history, the eleventh century, when it appeared as if involvement with ancient learning would lead to a new approach to knowledge. The eleventh century was a period of change in Byzantium's history, and its peculiar mixture of politics, religion and pedagogy characterises a state which at that point obsessively promoted its claim to ecumenical power and culture.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.