Clinical Legal Education

Abstract

Using the rhetorical device of a scholar looking backward, the author identifies shortcomings in legal education of the twentieth century and highlights positive changes in twenty-first-century methods of legal instruction.Not only did twentieth-century legal education fail to teach students practical legal skills, critical analysis and decision-making methods, but it did not give students systematic training in effective techniques for learning law from the experience of practicing law. In the last quarter of the twentieth century, a pedagogic method sometimes referred to as the clinical method of legal instruction was developed that would broaden legal education in all of these dimensions. In this clinical teaching method, students took part in role playing exercises designed to familiarize them with various aspects of legal practice; their performance in these role-playing exercises would then be critically evaluated by the legal instructor. The author points out, however, that implementing this pedagogic method effectively required that legal educational institutions cut back substantially on teaching the old curricula in the traditional method. This demanded re-motivation of law teachers, some retraining and not a little rethinking. But from our twenty-first-century perspective, concludes the author, it is clear that the gains outweigh the losses.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.