Style and stylizing from the perspective of a non-autonomous sociolinguistics

Abstract

Coupland's paper – one of the most innovative and thought-provoking contributions in this volume – essentially consists of three parts: (1) a critique of quantitative sociolinguistic approaches to the analysis of style; (2) a proposal for a new approach in which dialect style as a marker of identity takes center stage, informed by goal-orientation and other concerns from communication theory; (3) an extract from a radio broadcast by a Welsh DJ, illustrating the new approach. I'll comment on each of these components in turn. The critique of quantitative approaches to style Coupland's critique of quantitative approaches to style ranges further and cuts deeper than the earlier, largely methodological, critiques that he cites. His is more conceptual, concerned with the underlying assumptions of quantitative stylistics (so to speak), which he lists as ten numbered points and elaborates on in subsequent sections. I won't repeat or comment on all of his points, but the overall thrust of the critique – directed at “the theoretical limitations inherent in an autonomous sociolinguistics” (emphasis added) – is one that I endorse, and have voiced before. For instance, to adequately account for the quantitative distributions by social class that we observe in local surveys of language use, we need to turn to sociological and anthropological models of social stratification and life mode, but these are quite unfamiliar to the average sociolinguist (Rickford 1986, Williams 1992, Milroy and Milroy 1992).

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.