How Governance Misalignment and Outsourcing Capability Impact Performance

Sean M. Handley

61 citations0/0 files storedProduction and Operations Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management Innovation and Knowledge Management Quality and Supply Management

Abstract

Notwithstanding the popularity of outsourcing as a business strategy, the performance benefits realized through outsourcing efforts are observed to be mixed in practice. This leads to important unresolved questions regarding why some firms are able to derive substantial value from their outsourcing initiatives while other firms are left disappointed. This study joins an emerging literature integrating transaction cost economics and capabilities‐based perspectives to develop a deeper understanding of the drivers of outsourcing performance. I develop a theoretical model that examines the independent and joint influence of governance misalignment (i.e., deviation from transaction cost's predicted mode of governance) and a firm's outsourcing capability on the performance of outsourced processes. I test the theoretical model using a dataset of 172 outsourced and 156 in‐house processes. The finding that governance misalignment corresponds to inferior process performance supports transaction cost's discriminating alignment hypothesis. Interestingly, I also find that a retained technical expertise (TE) and outsourcing knowledge management routines (OKMR; both contributors to a firm's outsourcing capability) positively influence outsourcing performance both directly and via their relationship with governance misalignment. While a retained technical expertise and outsourcing knowledge management routines each positively influence outsourcing performance, they do so in distinctive ways. These findings have important managerial implications and make a significant theoretical contribution. Specifically, this study demonstrates that the notion of a governance misalignment is firm‐specific, conditional on the governance capabilities of the organization. This insight underscores the value of integrating transaction cost logic with capabilities‐based perspectives.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 61 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 1994A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation 1996Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm 1992Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology 1979Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations 2001Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.1979Moral Hazard and Observability

Cited by

2018Research in Operations Management and Information Systems Interface 2017Strategy and organization research in operations management 2024Impact of digital transformation misalignment on supplier financial risk 2017Economies Before Scale: Survival and Performance of Young Plants in the Age of Cloud Computing 2017Contract Theory: Impact on Biopharmaceutical Alliance Structure and Performance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.