Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginningRafael Dal−Ré, Ana Marušić2016-08-02reviewEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology32 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPharmaceutical industry and healthcareAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 32 citations exist upstream.References2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews2016Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors2015Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 20132013PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility2014The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials: Still a Problem2013"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study2014Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a RealityCited by2017Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications2024How can meta-research be used to evaluate and improve the quality of research in the field of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine?