Between Hierarchies and Markets
Abstract
Abstract This book explores the ways in which the word ‘network’ has been deployed in literature. In particular, it offers a commentary on how the idea of networks has been used to illustrate contemporary forms of socio-economic organisation (as with the idea of a ‘network society’ or a ‘network state’), broadly conceived to also include the political aspects of networks. The term ‘network’ has become a ubiquitous metaphor to describe too many aspects of contemporary life. In doing so, the book argues, the term has lost much of its analytical precision and has no clear conceptual underpinnings. This study brings some intellectual clarity to the discussion of networks by asking whether it is possible to construct a clearly demarcated idea of a network as a separable form of socio-economic coordination and governance mechanism with its own consistent logic. In doing this, the primary contrast is with hierarchies and markets as alternative and already well understood forms of socio-economic coordination each with their own distinctive logic. The book identifies two underlying programmatic issues: the question of whether there can be a particular logic to the network form of organisation, and whether there are any limits to networks. The book contends that if networks are to mean anything then they must not apply to everything, so this raises an obvious limit to their embrace. The questions thus become where and how to draw these limits. These are reviewed in the light of the concrete organisational forms that networks have taken in the contemporary period.
Cite this
Grahame F. Thompson (2003). Between Hierarchies and Markets. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198775270.001.0001
@book{f2003between,
title = {Between Hierarchies and Markets},
author = {Thompson, Grahame F.},
year = {2003},
doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198775270.001.0001}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 352 citations exist upstream.