Multi-Study Packages in Organizational Science Research

Wayne A. Hochwarter · Gerald R. Ferris · T. Johnston Hanes

59 citations0/0 files storedResearch methodology in strategy and management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Business Strategies and Management Research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Business and Management Studies

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this chapter is to examine the frequency of multi-study research packages in the organizational sciences and advocate for their use by detailing strengths and recognizing limitations.Methodology/approach – Philosophy of science research, focusing on multi-study research packages, is discussed followed by a 20-year review of incidence of these packages in top organizational sciences journals.Findings – The publication of multi-study research packages have increased over the past 10 years, most notably in micro-level journals.Social implications – For reasons of validity and generalizability, society benefits if scholars adopt multi-study approaches to knowledge generation and disseminate.Originality/value of the chapter – This chapter provides the most comprehensive review of multiple-study research packages in the organizational sciences to date, examining publication trends in eight leading micro-and macro-level journals. We also summarize the use of multi-study packages in our own research and offer recommendations for improving the science of replication.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1988Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.1988Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.1979The Social Psychology of Organizations.1977Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.1986Handbook of research on teaching 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.

Cited by

2011Theory in the organizational sciences 2023The born global and international new venture revisited: An alternative explanation for early and rapid internationalization 2014Examining the interactive effects of accountability, politics, and voice 2014Supervisor political support as a buffer to subordinates' reactions to politics perceptions 2021Job insecurity and innovative work behaviour: A moderated mediation model of intrinsic motivation and trait mindfulness

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.