No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract This essay explores Aristotle’s treatment of imagination. It argues that Aristotle need not be charged with the radical inconsistency in his treatment of phantasia diagnosed by Hamlyn. Although a conceptual link can be made between imagination and a use of ‘appears’, the link is not as close as the connection between phantasia and phainesthai, nor does ‘appears’ provide the natural entree to the study of imagination which phainetai provides to that of phantasia. A little lexicography will show that the syntactic behaviour and semantic range of phantasia are different from those of imagination.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 150 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.