SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The impact of Eugene Garfield through the prism of Web of Science
8 references·3 citing·39 second hop
The impact of Eugene Garfield through the prism of Web of Science (2010)The impact of Eugene Garfield through the…Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar (2010)Metadata mega mess in Google …Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h -index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008)Testing the Calculation of a …The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…A Deficiency in the Algorithm for Calculating the Impact Factor of Scholarly Journals: The Journal Impact Factor (2001)A Deficiency in the Algorithm…Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Fortnightly Review: How can i…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…The English language (1966)The English languageEnglish Spoken Here (1966)English Spoken HereGlobal Trends in Research of Mitochondrial Biogenesis over past 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis (2023)Global Trends in Research of …A state of the art of Lean Six Sigma in the Indian context – 21st century: a bibliometric analysis (2023)A state of the art of Lean Si…Interpretations and misinterpretations of scientometric data in the report of the Royal Society about the scientific landscape in 2011 (2011)Interpretations and misinterp…College Libraries and Chemical Education (1927)Which Medical Journals Have the Greatest Impact? (1986)Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas† (2006)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors (1995)UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS OF THE JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR (2003)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science (1967)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts (2006)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews (2019)Global research trends and hotspots on human intestinal fungi and health: a bibliometric visualization study (2024)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)An exploratory study of critical success factors in Lean Six Sigma 4.0 implementation: the people, processes and technology perspective through DEMATEL-ISM approach (2025)World Englishes and English-Using Communities (1997)Current Perspectives on Teaching World Englishes and English as a Lingua Franca (2006)English around the World (2020)Korean Americans as speakers of English: The acquisition of general and regional features (2000)Indian 'Commercial Fiction' in English, the Publishing Industry and Youth Culture (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,877 cited
  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,841 cited
  • 1996Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?484 cited
  • 1966The English language231 cited
  • 2010Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar143 cited
  • 2008Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h -index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster102 cited
  • 2001A Deficiency in the Algorithm for Calculating the Impact Factor of Scholarly Journals: The Journal Impact Factor56 cited
  • 1966English Spoken Here13 cited

Cited by

  • 2023A state of the art of Lean Six Sigma in the Indian context – 21st century: a bibliometric analysis15 cited
  • 2023Global Trends in Research of Mitochondrial Biogenesis over past 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis7 cited
  • 2011Interpretations and misinterpretations of scientometric data in the report of the Royal Society about the scientific landscape in 20117 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work