RELIABILISM, VERITISM, AND EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM

Alvin I. Goldman

97 citations0/0 files storedEpisteme

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophical Ethics and Theory Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Abstract

ABSTRACT According to Selim Berker the prevalence of consequentialism in contemporary epistemology rivals its prevalence in contemporary ethics. Similarly, and more to the point, Berker finds epistemic consequentialism, epitomized by process reliabilism, to be as misguided and problematic as ethical consequentialism. This paper shows how Berker misconstrues process reliabilism and fails to pinpoint any new or substantial defects in it.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 97 citations exist upstream.

References

n.d.A theory of justice original edition 1999Knowledge in a Social World 1987Epistemology and Cognition 1993The Reasons We Can Share: An Attack on the Distinction Between Agent-Relative and Agent-Neutral Values 1979What is Justified Belief?1976Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem 1989Epistemology and Cognition.1979Justification and Knowledge

Cited by

2017Knowledge, Dexterity, and Attention : A Theory of Epistemic Agency 2018Disagreement and the division of epistemic labor 2019Morality and Epistemic Judgement 2015REPLY TO GOLDMAN: CUTTING UP THE ONE TO SAVE THE FIVE IN EPISTEMOLOGY 2018Can there be a burden of the best explanation?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.