SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Admissibility Standards for Scientific Evidence · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterAdmissibility Standards for Scientific Evidence

Rockne Harmon2005

Chapter2005

Admissibility Standards for Scientific Evidence

20 citations·0/0 files stored·Elsevier eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Forensic and Genetic Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Federal Rules of Evidence 2005Black's Law Dictionary, 8th ed.

Cited by

2014Sobre la cientificidad de la prueba científica en el proceso judicial 2009Use of Forensic Methods Under Exigent Circumstances Without Full Validation 2015La admisibilidad de las pruebas periciales y la racionalidad de las decisiones judiciales

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2007Causality: Concepts, Issues, and Recommendationschapter · 2 shared references 2005Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studiesarticle · 1 shared reference 2006Gruesome Evidence and Emotion: Anger, Blame, and Jury Decision-Making.article · 1 shared reference 2012Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reformarticle · 1 shared reference 2025Police-induced confessions, 2.0: Risk factors and recommendations.article · 1 shared reference 2000The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?article · 1 shared reference

Details

Year2005

Typechapter

Published2005-01-01

VenueElsevier eBooks

Languageen

Citations20

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1016/b978-012088483-4/50021-4

openalex_workW2491727699

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.