this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
- 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
- 1994Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences3,016 cited
- 1964Strong Inference2,904 cited
- 1960The Logic of Scientific Discovery.2,444 cited
- 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
- 2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
- 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
- 1965The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses1,071 cited
- 1890The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses504 cited
- 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
- 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature355 cited
- 2015How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop296 cited
- 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
- 2003Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence222 cited
- 2015Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work