Cancellation and Intention

Abstract

Robyn Carston (2002) has claimed that explicatures can be cancelled. I argue that cancellation of explicature is logically impossible and empirically incorrect. Instead, it should be thought of as clarification of speaker’s intended explicature. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.