References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2018A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing the Measurement Properties of the Three-Level and Five-Level Versions of the EQ-5D355 cited
• 2018Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L: a cross-country analysis of population surveys for 20 countries333 cited
• 2010Patient‐reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ‐5D data264 cited
• 2009Danish EQ-5D population norms261 cited
• 2009Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states261 cited
• 2016EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes245 cited
• 2011Valuing EQ-5D using Time Trade-Off in France199 cited
• 2015Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?178 cited
• 2009The EQ-5D Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire151 cited
• 2010A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the ‘lead time’ approach145 cited
• 2013The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS)—quality of life during the first 4 months after fracture141 cited
• 2010Discrete Choice Modeling for the Quantification of Health States: The Case of the EQ-5D121 cited
• 2012Measuring preference-based quality of life in children aged 6–7 years: a comparison of the performance of the CHU-9D and EQ-5D-Y—the WAVES Pilot Study