SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Insurance and Risk Management for Robotic Devices: Identifying the Problems
5 references·1 citing·20 second hop
Insurance and Risk Management for Robotic Devices: Identifying the Problems (2016)Insurance and Risk Management for Robotic…Robotic prostheses as products enhancing the rights of people with disabilities. Reconsidering the structure of liability rules (2015)Robotic prostheses as product…Robots as Products: The Case for a Realistic Analysis of Robotic Applications and Liability Rules (2013)Robots as Products: The Case …Bridging the Accountability Gap: Rights for New Entities in the Information Society? (2010)Bridging the Accountability G…Robotics, philosophy and the problems of autonomy (2005)Robotics, philosophy and the …The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata (2004)The responsibility gap: Ascri…Maritime remote inspection technology in hull survey & inspection: A synopsis of liability issues from a European Union context (2021)Maritime remote inspection te…Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral (1972)Oxford English dictionary (2004)Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy (2013)Science and Human Behavior. (1954)The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding (1992)Meditations on First Philosophy (1996)Personal Robots, Appearance, and Human Good: A Methodological Reflection on Roboethics (2009)The autonomy-safety-paradox of service robotics in Europe and Japan: a comparative analysis (2015)Make Way for the Robots! Human- and Machine-Centricity in Constituting a European Public–Private Partnership (2019)Scrutton on charterparties and bills of lading (1974)The application of traditional tort theory to embodied machine intelligence (2016)Liability for AI: public policy considerations (2021)Vital, Sophia, and Co.—The Quest for the Legal Personhood of Robots (2018)Artificial moral and legal personhood (2020)Rights for Robots (2020)Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy (2016)Person, Thing, Robot (2023)Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges (2018)In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability (2020)The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata1,095 cited
  • 2013Robots as Products: The Case for a Realistic Analysis of Robotic Applications and Liability Rules98 cited
  • 2010Bridging the Accountability Gap: Rights for New Entities in the Information Society?59 cited
  • 2005Robotics, philosophy and the problems of autonomy52 cited
  • 2015Robotic prostheses as products enhancing the rights of people with disabilities. Reconsidering the structure of liability rules17 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Maritime remote inspection technology in hull survey & inspection: A synopsis of liability issues from a European Union context10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work