Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A comparative study between xerographic, computer-assisted overlay generation and animated-superimposition methods in bite mark analyses

16 references·1 citing·27 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
2009Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward957 cited
2006Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony462 cited
2001The scientific basis for human bitemark analyses – a critical review104 cited
1984Statistical Evidence for the Individuality of the Human Dentition88 cited
1998Accuracy of Bite Mark Overlays: A Comparison of Five Common Methods to Produce Exemplars from a Suspect's Dentition85 cited
2001HUMAN BITE MARKS IN FORENSIC DENTISTRY54 cited
2004Computer-Based Production of Comparison Overlays from 3D-Scanned Dental Casts for Bite Mark Analysis54 cited
1991A Practical Technique for the Fabrication of Transparent Bite Mark Overlays36 cited
1996The use of a digital imaging technique to aid bite mark analysis36 cited
1974Bite Mark Recognition and Interpretation35 cited
1979Review of bite mark evidence29 cited
1996Dentistry, bite marks and the investigation of crime.29 cited
2004A Comparison Between Direct and Indirect Methods Available for Human Bite Mark Analysis27 cited
1982Bite mark evidence.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited

2011Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts14 cited

Cited by

2018Evaluation of accuracy of human bite marks on skin and an inanimate object: A forensic-based cross-sectional study9 cited