SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assumptions of Mixed Treatment Comparisons in Health Technology Assessments - Challenges and Possible Steps for Practical Application
16 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Assumptions of Mixed Treatment Comparisons in Health Technology Assessments - Challenges and Possible Steps for Practical Application (2016)Assumptions of Mixed Treatment Comparison…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Graphical Tools for Network M…Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)Evidence Synthesis for Decisi…Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Conceptual and Technical Chal…Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Interpreting Indirect Treatme…Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Conducting quantitative synth…Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2 (2011)Conducting Indirect-Treatment…Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Checking consistency in mixed…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Evaluation of networks of ran…Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Assessing Evidence Inconsiste…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…How to read and interpret the results of a Bayesian network meta-analysis: a short tutorial (2019)How to read and interpret the…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2010Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis2,517 cited
  • 2013Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA2,473 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,722 cited
  • 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
  • 2013Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis1,071 cited
  • 2011Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 11,036 cited
  • 2011Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

770 cited
  • 2006Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons755 cited
  • 2013Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4730 cited
  • 2011Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program728 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019How to read and interpret the results of a Bayesian network meta-analysis: a short tutorial14 cited