SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The LR does not exist · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe LR does not exist

Charles E.H. Berger2016

Article2016

The LR does not exist

Charles E.H. Berger · Klaas Slooten

60 citations·0/0 files stored·Science & Justice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2019Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis 2019Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices 2016What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?2016The consequences of understanding expert probability reporting as a decision 2016On the likelihood of “encapsulating all uncertainty”2018Status of Mandibular Third Molar Development as Evidence in Legal Age Threshold Cases 2018A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyer 2017The meaning of justified subjectivism and its role in the reconciliation of recent disagreements over forensic probabilism

Details

Year2016

Typearticle

Published2016-07-30

VenueScience & Justice

ISSN-L1355-0306

Languageen

Citations60

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.scijus.2016.06.005

openalex_workW2494610647

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.