Output Measures for Evaluating the Performance of Community College Learning Resources Programs: A California Case Study

Tobin de Leon Clarke · Elmer U. Clawson

1 citations0/0 files storedEmerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Library Science and Information Literacy Library Science and Information Library Science and Administration

Abstract

It became apparent that input measures by themselves (size of staff, amount of budget, number of books...) were no longer an appropriate means of evaluating library programs. In order to assist libraries to become more accountable, library output measures were developed. Output measures can relate to the number of materials circulated, the number of reference questions answered, the number of students receiving instruction, the number of productions,the amount of equipment used.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Assumptions Underlying Evaluation Models 1973Performance measures for public libraries 1973Organization and administration of the learning resources center in the community college 1976Newcomer to the Academic Scene: The Two-Year College Library/Learning Center 1982"Prove All Things: Hold Fast That Which is Good": Deaccessioning and Research Libraries 1977The Community College Library in the Mid-1970s 1978The Organization of Library and Media Services in Community Colleges 1973Junior College Libraries Enter the Seventies

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.