Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis

16 references·16 citing·39 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,804 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

670 cited

2008What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?613 cited

2010CONSORT 2010 Statement519 cited

2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited

Cited by

2018Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals56 cited
2020Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions49 cited
2020Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis38 cited
2020Completeness of reporting of case reports in high‐impact medical journals38 cited
2020Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin33 cited
2017Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts30 cited
2022A review of high impact journals found that misinterpretation of non-statistically significant results from randomized trials was common29 cited
2018Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting25 cited
2019The Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts in Plastic Surgery25 cited
2021Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review24 cited
2017Hematology journals do not sufficiently adhere to reporting guidelines: a systematic review23 cited
2019Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals21 cited
2021Critical analysis of the reporting quality of randomized trials within Endodontics using the Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 quality standard checklist21 cited
2020Quality, scope and reporting standards of randomised controlled trials in Irish Health Research: an observational study20 cited
2021Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin16 cited
2023Reporting quality of abstracts from randomised controlled trials published in leading critical care nursing journals: a methodological quality review14 cited