Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Stings, Hoaxes and Irony Breach the Trust Inherent in Scientific Publishing

11 references·3 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials1,155 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2012Council of International Organizations for Medical Sciences652 cited
2007The ups and downs of peer review296 cited
2014Peer review: still king in the digital age243 cited
2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited
2008A tale of two citations175 cited
2014Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review158 cited
2014Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection64 cited
2012Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science60 cited
2013Health Journalists’ Perceptions of Their Communities and Implications for the Delivery of Health Information in the News53 cited

Cited by

2016ON THE ABUSE OF ONLINE SUBMISSION SYSTEMS, FAKE PEER REVIEWS AND EDITOR-CREATED ACCOUNTS15 cited
2021How do Clarivate Analytics and Publons propose to fortify peer review in the COVID-19 era?11 cited
2019How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

9 cited