No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This chapter investigates ways in which linguistic landscaping (LL) practices have been an important site in negotiating ‘boundaries of in-/ex-clusion’ for both the Taiwanese peoples and the island itself — including ethnolin-guistic, cultural, socioeconomic, (geo)political and/or other types of belonging. Importantly, current LL practices are considered in relation to broader social and political discourses that have shaped Taiwanese identifications over time, from the period of Japanese colonization (1895–1945; a time of ‘Japanization’), to the martial law era imposed by the Chinese Nationalist Government or Kuo Ming Tang (KMT; 1949–1987; a period of ‘re-Sinicization’), to the current chapter of democratization (late 1980s to present; the season of ‘Taiwanization’). Throughout Taiwan’s modern history, then, ‘languages and language choice have come to be invested with remarkable symbolic power’ in shaping Taiwanese identities and in vying for political allegiances (Simpson, 2007, p. 236). As argued here, the symbolic power of language in Taiwan is especially salient in the LL of the capital city, Taipei, where both the referential content and the visuality of language and script continue to play prominent roles in indexing different identities and alliances. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.