No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Despite a growing number of ostraca and papyri much of the history of Ptolemaic Egypt still rests largely on the text of Polybius. I hope therefore that my friend and colleague, Herbert Fairman, will accept as a suitable tribute to his achievements in the field of Ptolemaic language and culture, and to the generosity with which he invariably makes his scholarship available to all who approach him, some observations on the merits of what Polybius has to say about Ptolemaic Egypt and on the rôle which he assigned to that kingdom in his account of the rise of Rome to world power. Polybius is especially concerned with the reigns of four Ptolemies – Philopator, Epiphanes, Philometor and Euergetes II. Since he was born towards the end of the third century he had to depend for his account of Philopator mainly on previous writers, whereas to some extent for Epiphanes and even more for the other two he was a contemporary and could command direct sources of information. Unfortunately our text of Polybius is incomplete. From the books covering events after Raphia, 217 bc , we possess only fragments; consequently we are at the mercy of Polybius' excerptors and can be brought to a halt in mid-stream whenever their interest flags. Also, a more grievous loss, only six out of the fifty-three titles of excerpts assembled on the orders of Constantine Porphyrogenitus have survived.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.