No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This chapter examines clause structure and the syntax of so-called verbless sentences, focusing on a key issue in the theory of clause structure that also engages the interface between syntax and morphology: whether both tense and verb are universally projected elements in every clause. Drawing on a study of verbless sentences in Arabic, it argues that tense is universally projected but verb is not and proposes that tense is categorially defined in terms of a feature D (nominal) and an optional feature V (verbal). More specifically, it suggests that past tense is specified for both D- and V-features, while present tense is specified for a D-feature only. The chapter also considers whether verbless sentences have a verbal copula, sentential negation and tense, the morphology of tense, and the nominal feature of tense.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.