No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
K arl Mannheim is a ubiquitous reference in scholarly work on generations, yet the usefulness of his essay “The Problem of Generations” as a basis for social scientific research is highly contested. 2 For some, it is an “undervalued legacy,” one that demonstrates the importance of generations in social life and offers invaluable guidance to their proper conceptualization. 3 But for others, Mannheim fails to define the generation with any great precision. He thus conflates the impact of generations with age- and cohort-effects, 4 leaving underspecified the links between generations and other social factors, including class. 5 Political scientists have also shown that generational membership and generational shifts do not always predict political views with great accuracy, placing further doubt on the appropriateness of a generational account of political change. 6 As a result, while he is widely acknowledged as the father of generational analysis, Mannheim’s essay is frequently cited, but just as frequently ignored. 7 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.