SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Moses–Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
The Moses–Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models (2016)The Moses–Littenberg meta-analytical meth…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data (2006)Meta-DiSc: a software for met…A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)A unification of models for m…The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)The performance of tests of p…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (2005)A methodological review of ho…Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests (2002)Exploring sources of heteroge…Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Advanced methods in meta‐anal…Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Statistical Methods for Exami…A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)A hierarchical regression app…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting Reports (1993)Estimating Diagnostic Accurac…Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Combining independent studies…A bivariate approach to meta‐analysis (1993)A bivariate approach to meta‐…Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis: A Practical Guide to Hierarchical Models (2025)Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis (2015)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Association of Torture and Other Potentially Traumatic Events With Mental Health Outcomes Among Populations Exposed to Mass Conflict and Displacement (2009)Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. (2014)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient (1983)Item Response Theory (1985)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data (2009)Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (2013)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems (2012)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 2005The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2,906 cited
  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 2001Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis2,163 cited
  • 2006Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data1,884 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2002Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression1,582 cited
  • 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations1,509 cited
  • 1993Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations1,404 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2023Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy755 cited
  • 2006A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies752 cited
  • 2002Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests446 cited
  • 2005

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
439 cited
  • 1993Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting Reports434 cited
  • 1993A bivariate approach to meta‐analysis327 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis: A Practical Guide to Hierarchical Models14 cited