SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach
14 references·7 citing·43 second hop
Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach (2016)Meta-analysis for the comparison of two d…A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies (2015)A general framework for compa…Methods for the joint meta‐analysis of multiple tests (2014)Methods for the joint meta‐an…Meta-Analysis of Test Accuracy Studies with Multiple and Missing Thresholds: A Multivariate-Normal Model (2014)Meta-Analysis of Test Accurac…A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews (2014)A composite likelihood method…Meta‐analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta‐binomial distributions and bivariate copulas (2013)Meta‐analysis for diagnostic …Empirical Evidence of the Importance of Comparative Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2013)Empirical Evidence of the Imp…Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds (2009)Multivariate random effects m…Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: Alternative parameterizations and model selection (2009)Meta‐analysis of diagnostic a…Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX (2009)Bivariate Random-effects Meta…Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach (2006)Bivariate meta-analysis of se…Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds (2003)Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic T…Empirical comparisons of meta-analysis methods for diagnostic studies: a meta-epidemiological study (2022)Empirical comparisons of meta…Challenges in Comparative Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Multiple Diagnostic Tests (2021)Challenges in Comparative Met…Meta‐analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values (2020)Meta‐analysis of full ROC cur…Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance (2019)Methods and reporting of syst…Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Network Meta-Analysis of Diag…A D-vine copula mixed model for joint meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests (2018)A D-vine copula mixed model f…Meta‐analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests—A new approach based on copulas (2017)Meta‐analysis for the compari…Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Fully non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for random-effects meta-analysis (2014)Bayesian bivariate meta‐analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors (2017)The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R (2018)Understanding Relationships Using Copulas (1998)An Introduction to Copulas (1999)Many meta-analyses of rare events in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were underpowered (2020)Methods for deriving risk difference (absolute risk reduction) from a meta-analysis (2023)What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data (2004)Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007)Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis (2015)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Revisiting youden's index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies (2008)Chapter 8: Meta-analysis of Test Performance When There is a “Gold Standard” (2012)Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (R-CBM): A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of evidence supporting use in universal screening (2014)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health (2015)Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates (2016)Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review (2017)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Challenges in Using Nonrandomized Studies in Systematic Reviews of Treatment Interventions (2005)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)The diagnostic accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses (2014)A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models (2009)Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk (2010)The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2006Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach709 cited
  • 2013Empirical Evidence of the Importance of Comparative Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy187 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies176 cited
  • 2009Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds130 cited
  • 2003Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds101 cited
  • 2009Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: Alternative parameterizations and model selection91 cited
  • 2013Meta‐analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta‐binomial distributions and bivariate copulas65 cited
  • 2009Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX51 cited
  • 2015A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies44 cited
  • 2014Methods for the joint meta‐analysis of multiple tests40 cited
  • 2014Meta-Analysis of Test Accuracy Studies with Multiple and Missing Thresholds: A Multivariate-Normal Model38 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014
A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews
31 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance22 cited
  • 2022Empirical comparisons of meta-analysis methods for diagnostic studies: a meta-epidemiological study16 cited
  • 2018Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies13 cited
  • 2020Meta‐analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values12 cited
  • 2021Challenges in Comparative Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Multiple Diagnostic Tests10 cited
  • 2018A D-vine copula mixed model for joint meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests8 cited
  • 2017Meta‐analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests—A new approach based on copulas8 cited