No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This paper argues how an oft-repeated comparison between the historiography of philosophy and contemporary cultural anthropology, habitually invoked in order to support arguments in favor of relativist if not outright skeptical arguments about historical truth, can be put to a more constructive use. First, by spelling out the epistemological implications of some methodological intuitions most acutely formulated by anthropologists, it sketches out a method for the historiography of philosophy dubbed historical perspectivism. This method stresses the role that contextually internal perspectives play in the constitution of the true historical meaning of past philosophical texts. It also discusses how historical perspectivism is a form of historical actualism.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 41 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.