Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Do differences in male versus female /s/ reflect biological or sociophonetic factors?

16 references·2 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1971Acoustic Theory of Speech Production2,946 cited
2000Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives873 cited
1999Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging847 cited
1988Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data499 cited
1999Uncovering the Role of Gender Stereotypes in Speech Perception388 cited
2005The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech276 cited
2006The next toolkit271 cited
1956Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants239 cited
2002A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives238 cited
2001The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production228 cited
1995An articulatory study of fricative consonants using magnetic resonance imaging183 cited
1968Identification of Speaker Sex from Isolated, Voiceless Fricatives141 cited
2007Empirical evidence for gendered speech production: /s/ in Glaswegian117 cited
2004The Distinctness of Speakers' /s/—/∫/ Contrast Is Related to Their Auditory Discrimination and Use of an Articulatory Saturation Effect113 cited
1999Acoustic Characteristics of /s/ in Adolescents

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

111 cited

1991EPG data reduction methods and their implications for studies of lingual coarticulation105 cited

Cited by

2013Developmental and gender-related trends of intra-talker variability in consonant production56 cited
2016Jane Lynch and /s/: The Effect of Addressee Sexuality on Fricative Realization3 cited