No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
E lizabeth Cady Stanton’s wonderment at the preoccupation of early Christian male writers with women’s clothing—and, in particular, headdress—directs our attention to the real foreground of early Christian writings on women’s heads: the minds of men. For early Christian men, as, it seems, for men of antiquity in general, women’s heads were indeed sexual members, and at least two of these men, Paul and Tertullian, expended much thought and no little ink in efforts to enforce the sexual character of women’s heads. Their association of women’s heads and genitals seems to be entirely conscious; in the case of Tertullian, it is startlingly explicit. It is far from clear, on the other hand, that early Christian women experienced their heads as sexual organs. While it is possible to discern traces of the women’s religious clothing and hairdressing practices in the works of these men, we have no direct access to the meanings the women themselves gave them. Antiquity provides some clues suggesting that these meanings may have differed widely from male interpretations of women’s bodies and dress. But for the most part, the women of early Christianity are visible to later generations only through the eroticizing veil of the male gaze. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.