Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps

16 references·16 citing·26 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2005Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis44,511 cited
2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
2007Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method9,606 cited
2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,450 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,780 cited
2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,889 cited

2011'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review1,259 cited

Cited by

2020The (in)visible victims of disaster: Understanding the vulnerability of undocumented Latino/a and indigenous immigrants240 cited
2021A systematic literature review of societal acceptance and stakeholders’ perception of hydrogen technologies207 cited
2019Key attributes of integrated community-based youth service hubs for mental health: a scoping review172 cited
2019What makes mental health and substance use services youth friendly? A scoping review of literature139 cited
2022A scoping review of personalized user experiences on social media: The interplay between algorithms and human factors137 cited
2019Scoping reviews in health professions education: challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology133 cited
2019An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality130 cited
2021The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient‐centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait‐listed patients and caregivers during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A scoping review122 cited
2021Queer and present danger: understanding the disparate impacts of disasters on LGBTQ+ communities121 cited
2022The impact of caring for family members with mental illnesses on the caregiver: a scoping review119 cited
2020Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review105 cited
2022Pathways to inclusive and equitable quality early childhood education for achieving SDG4 goal—a scoping review90 cited
2019Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users89 cited
2022Arksey and O′Malleyʼs consultation exercise in scoping reviews: A critical review82 cited
2022Scoping reviews and rapid reviews74 cited
2023Recommendations to align higher education teaching with the UN sustainability goals – A scoping survey71 cited