SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting and Transparency in Big Data: The Nexus of Ethics and Methodology
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Reporting and Transparency in Big Data: The Nexus of Ethics and Methodology (2016)Reporting and Transparency in Big Data: T…The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015)The REporting of studies Cond…The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts (2015)The Ethics of Big Data: Curre…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Policy: NIH plans to enhance …Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)A catalogue of reporting guid…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Psychological Distress in Refugee Children: A Systematic Review (2010)The Influence of the Therapist-Patient Relationship on Treatment Outcome in Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2010)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE) (2018)Association of Surgeon-Patient Sex Concordance With Postoperative Outcomes (2021)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2015The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement5,686 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement1,987 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2014Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility1,247 cited
  • 2009A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research1,047 cited
  • 2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals
739 cited
  • 2015The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts713 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.