2 B.C. and Julia’s Adultery

W. K. Lacey

45 citations0/0 files storedAntichthon

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Classical Antiquity Studies Classical Philosophy and Thought Historical and Religious Studies of Rome

Abstract

Modern historians of Rome have expended much care and ingenuity in discussing the constitutional basis for the Augustan principate. Ancient historians had a much simpler view — it was a monarchy. And they were right, even if it was a monarchy within a constitution so that as monarch Augustus contrived to govern with the consent (and support in many cases) of the traditional governing classes without constantly having to invoke the reserve powers of a monarch whose will is ultimately sovereign.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

References

1940The Roman Revolution 1966Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum 1976TIBERIUS THE POLITICIAN 1980History in Ovid

Cited by

1996Rome and its development under Augustus and his successors 1996The Cambridge Ancient History 1996The imperial court 1996Augustus: power, authority, achievement 1996The triumviral period 1996Social status and social legislation 1996Political history, 30 B.C. to A.D. 14 1996Tiberius to Nero

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.