SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Good enough practices in scientific computing
5 references·14 citing·48 second hopsampled
Good enough practices in scientific computing (2017)Good enough practices in scientific compu…Best Practices for Scientific Computing (2014)Best Practices for Scientific…Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research (2013)Ten Simple Rules for Reproduc…A Quick Guide to Organizing Computational Biology Projects (2009)A Quick Guide to Organizing C…The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)The magical number seven, plu…The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The magical number seven, plu…The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond (2023)The five pillars of computati…“Garbage in, garbage out” revisited: What do machine learning application papers report about human-labeled training data? (2021)“Garbage in, garbage out” rev…Ten simple rules for writing Dockerfiles for reproducible data science (2020)Ten simple rules for writing …Garbage in, garbage out? (2020)Garbage in, garbage out?Ten simple rules for writing and sharing computational analyses in Jupyter Notebooks (2019)Ten simple rules for writing …EviAtlas: a tool for visualising evidence synthesis databases (2019)EviAtlas: a tool for visualis…Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers (2018)Reproducible research and GIS…Re-run, Repeat, Reproduce, Reuse, Replicate: Transforming Code into Scientific Contributions (2018)Re-run, Repeat, Reproduce, Re…Identifying and Overcoming Threats to Reproducibility, Replicability, Robustness, and Generalizability in Microbiome Research (2018)Identifying and Overcoming Th…Exploration and Explanation in Computational Notebooks (2018)Exploration and Explanation i…Ten simple rules for making research software more robust (2017)Ten simple rules for making r…Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools (2017)Our path to better science in…Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software (2017)Four simple recommendations t…A prototype cloud-based reproducible data analysis and visualization platform for outputs of agent-based models (2017)A prototype cloud-based repro…An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants (1955)Experimental Psychology (1955)A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures (1977)How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process (1990)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Preliminaries to speech analysis (2020)Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis (2005)Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences (2010)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Good enough practices in scientific computing. (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Computational science: ...Error (2010)Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing (2010)Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff (2013)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (1940)Working Memory (1974)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology (2018)Situating Ecology as a Big-Data Science: Current Advances, Challenges, and Solutions (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Promoting an open research culture (2015)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools (2019)Towards FAIR principles for research software (2019)A large-scale study on research code quality and execution (2022)The WyCash portfolio management system (1992)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)A Large-Scale Study About Quality and Reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks (2019)Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processing (2021)Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist (2021)Towards Bayesian Model-Based Demography (2021)Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (2016)Towards reproducible computational drug discovery (2020)Using Jupyter for Reproducible Scientific Workflows (2021)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (2020)Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research (2021)An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.17,866 cited
  • 1994The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.17,469 cited
  • 2013Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research935 cited
  • 2014Best Practices for Scientific Computing727 cited
  • 2009A Quick Guide to Organizing Computational Biology Projects102 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Exploration and Explanation in Computational Notebooks347 cited
  • 2017Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools287 cited
  • 2018Identifying and Overcoming Threats to Reproducibility, Replicability, Robustness, and Generalizability in Microbiome Research281 cited
  • 2019Ten simple rules for writing and sharing computational analyses in Jupyter Notebooks196 cited
  • 2020Garbage in, garbage out?167 cited
  • 2017Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software143 cited
  • 2020Ten simple rules for writing Dockerfiles for reproducible data science125 cited
  • 2018Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers122 cited
  • 2017Ten simple rules for making research software more robust119 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Re-run, Repeat, Reproduce, Reuse, Replicate: Transforming Code into Scientific Contributions118 cited
  • 2019EviAtlas: a tool for visualising evidence synthesis databases112 cited
  • 2021“Garbage in, garbage out” revisited: What do machine learning application papers report about human-labeled training data?102 cited
  • 2023The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond100 cited
  • 2017A prototype cloud-based reproducible data analysis and visualization platform for outputs of agent-based models6 cited