SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ranking of Design Journals Based on Results of the UK Research Excellence Framework: Using REF as Referee
9 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Ranking of Design Journals Based on Results of the UK Research Excellence Framework: Using REF as Referee (2016)Ranking of Design Journals Based on Resul…The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of th…Predicting results of the research excellence framework using departmental h-index: revisited (2015)Predicting results of the res…Finding “good enough” metrics for the UK’s research excellence framework (2015)Finding “good enough” metrics…Predicting results of the Research Excellence Framework using departmental h-index (2014)Predicting results of the Res…Quality perceptions of design journals: The design scholars’ perspective (2011)Quality perceptions of design…Design research journal ranking study: preliminary results (2008)Design research journal ranki…Technical note: Objective and subjective rankings of scientific journals in the field of ergonomics: 2004-2005 (2005)Technical note: Objective and…An assessment system for rating scientific journals in the field of ergonomics and human factors (2004)An assessment system for rati…The counting house (2002)The counting houseComparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence (2013)San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)A scientists' view of scientometrics: Not everything that counts can be counted (2017)Have you Read This? An Empirical Comparison of the British REF Peer Review and the Italian VQR Bibliometric Algorithm (2021)Prediction of UK research excellence framework assessment by the departmental h -index (2021)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)DETERMINANTS OF FACULTY PAY: AN AGENCY THEORY PERSPECTIVE. (1992)Ranking the International Business Journals (2000)Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals (2004)Correlation Between Perception-Based Journal Rankings and the Journal Impact Factor (JIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)Using Text Mining Techniques to Identify Research Trends: A Case Study of Design Research (2017)Collaboration in Design Research: An Analysis of Co-Authorship in 13 Design Research Journals, 2000–2015 (2019)‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system (1997)Altmetrics: A manifesto (2010)The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)Judging research papers for research excellence (2017)Are Italian research assessment exercises size-biased? (2020)On computer science research and its temporal evolution (2022)The Structure of Medical Informatics Journal Literature (1998)Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)The research-practice relationship in ergonomics and human factors – surveying and bridging the gap (2011)Effect of sampling interval on the reliability of ergonomic analysis using the Ovako working posture analysing system (OWAS) (2016)Human Work and Status Evaluation Based on Wearable Sensors in Human Factors and Ergonomics: A Review (2018)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)What are we measuring? Refocusing on some fundamentals in the age of desktop bibliometrics (2018)Наукометрія та управління науковою діяльністю: вкотре про світове та українське (2019)Do bibliometrics introduce gender, institutional or interdisciplinary biases into research evaluations? (2023)A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics (2000)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Evaluation of Social Work Journal Quality: Citation versus Reputation Approaches (2004)Ranking Taiwanese management journals: A case study (2008)The authorship and internationality of Industrial Engineering journals (2009)Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics (2016)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
  • 2002The counting house447 cited
  • 2011Quality perceptions of design journals: The design scholars’ perspective72 cited
  • 2014Predicting results of the Research Excellence Framework using departmental h-index36 cited
  • 2004An assessment system for rating scientific journals in the field of ergonomics and human factors35 cited
  • 2005Technical note: Objective and subjective rankings of scientific journals in the field of ergonomics: 2004-200518 cited
  • 2015Predicting results of the research excellence framework using departmental h-index: revisited17 cited
  • 2015Finding “good enough” metrics for the UK’s research excellence framework15 cited
  • 2008Design research journal ranking study: preliminary results11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work