Citations in Supreme Court Opinions and Briefs: A Comparative Study

William H. Manz

13 citations0/0 files storedLaw library journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Legal Studies and Policies

Abstract

Mr. Manz surveys the use of authority by the United States Supreme Court during the October 1996 Term, comparing it to the authorities cited in the briefs submitted to the Court. He seeks to present a broader profile of the sources of authority cited by those involved with the appellate process, and to determine to what extent the Court�s research locates materials not included in the briefs.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

References

1981State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation 1954The Authority of Authority: What the California Supreme Court Cited in 1950 1999The Lexicon Has Become a Fortress: The United States Supreme Court's Use of Dictionaries 1959Legal Periodicals and the United States Supreme Court 1999Other than 'Accepted Sources of Law'?: A Quantitative Study of Secondary Source Citations in the High Court 1985Citations to Authority in Supreme Court Opinions 1996Judges and Scholars: Do Courts and Scholarly Journals Cite the Same Law Review Articles

Cited by

2007A Century of Citation Practice on the Supreme Court of Victoria

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.